Washington was already on his third nomination in 1992, having been nominated as a Supporting Actor for Cry Freedom and Glory; it was the latter that resulted in his first Oscar win. Malcolm X was his first nod for Lead Actor; his next five nominations would all follow suit: 1999's The Hurricane, 2001's Training Day (another win), 2012's Flight, 2016's Fences (for which he should have won a third Oscar) and 2017's Roman J. Israel, Esq. All told, that's eight nominations, exactly the tally Pacino had before he finally won his first:
Since then, there's been some debate over who should have won this year. Hell, it's a debate that goes even further back, to 1974-75: if Pacino won for either The Godfather: Part Two (as he could've) or Dog Day Afternoon (as he should've), would there have been less pressure to give him a career Oscar, thereby allowing Washington to take what Spike Lee claimed was rightfully his? Would Washington have even won? A second Oscar in three years doesn't always happen, and there were three other nominees, all on their first time; I can especially see a case for veteran Eastwood becoming the first actor-director to claim both prizes in one night. And what about Stephen Rea, star of the indie film du jour and Best Picture contender The Crying Game?
Fortunately, I'm here to settle once and for all not just the coulda-woulda - but more importantly, the shoulda:
Chaplin
**
first of two nominations; BAFTA Award winner for Best Actor; Golden Globe nominee for Best Actor - Drama
first of two nominations; BAFTA Award winner for Best Actor; Golden Globe nominee for Best Actor - Drama
Unforgiven
*****
first of two acting nominations; LAFCA Awards winner for Best Actor
first of two acting nominations; LAFCA Awards winner for Best Actor
Scent of a Woman
****
eighth of nine nominations; Golden Globe winner for Best Actor - Drama; NYFCC Awards second runner-up for Best Actor
One almost forgives the movie's length because he makes Frank so watchable. The tango is a famous sequence, of course, though it's the lead-up to it that strikes me most: he really can turn on the charm when he needs to. It's a performance that could very easily become repetitive, a character that's not very difficult to dislike, but Pacino navigates the journey expertly. Great performance in a not-so-great movie.
The Crying Game
***
first and only nomination; BAFTA Awards nominee for Best Actor
A reactive role for the most part - he listens, he absorbs, he sits and takes it, smug face, arms crossed. Laconic on the outside, but it masks an uncertainty, and here is Where I think Rea makes the greatest choice: so uncertain, so reactive is Fergus, that When he does take action, it's alWays urgent and clumsy. Chasing Jody, kissing Dil, rehearsing the hit: he goes about each of these so uncomfortably, because actually doing something is so alien to him. Terrific chemistry With co-star Davidson.
Malcolm X
*****
past winner, third of eight acting nominations; NYFCC Awards winner for Best Actor; Golden Globe nominee for Best Actor - Drama, LAFCA Awards runner-up for Best Actor
past winner, third of eight acting nominations; NYFCC Awards winner for Best Actor; Golden Globe nominee for Best Actor - Drama, LAFCA Awards runner-up for Best Actor
---------------------------------------
As I said above, I can see an argument for Eastwood - God how I can see it! - but there's nothing else this year that rivals the titanic achievement of:
for
MALCOLM X
Tomorrow, the nominees for Score: Aladdin, Basic Instinct, Chaplin, Howards End and A River Runs Through It.
No comments:
Post a Comment